Art Hound, a guide to living with art Art Hound

on the hunt for good art

Artist Crush: Max Berry

August 2nd, 2011 · No Comments

Max Berry is a young artist based in Sydney. His surrealist work is intriguing but calming, in an unexpectedly soft style. Read more about the artist here.

Max Berry’s work creates a world where every object has a life of its own, a daydream land where houses talk to clouds and characters float playfully in abstracted space. Fascinated by obscure lore and strange unknown lands, his work explores the human condition in a playful journey into the surreal. – artist’s website

.

.

.

.

Pepa’s World

August 12th, 2010 · No Comments

New work by dynamo surrealist illustrator, Pepa Prieto.

.

.

Artist Cheat-Sheet: Rene Magritte

July 26th, 2010 · No Comments

About the Artist Cheat-Sheet Series:

In this series I match major artists of the 19th or 20th century with current independent artists who share the artist’s style, subject, tone, etc. By introducing you to artists similar to your favorites, you’ll no longer have the excuse of not knowing any modern day artists you like!

Rene Magritte

As soon as I was introduced to Rene Magritte back in high school, I was drawn to the Belgian Surrealist’s work. Here were world-famous paintings that, unlike all others I’d studied, had a modern visual language and were loaded with wit and irony. It was a classic teenage reaction of excitement seeing an adult (Magritte) thumbing their nose at other grown-ups. This was good stuff! I thought.

I still love Magritte for the same reasons- how he flagrantly subverted cultural norms and perverted people’s sense of propriety. The brilliance of his work lies in the Freudian, surreal mise-en-scenes which riff off of familiar, ordinary contexts. The following are six artists who are, in one fashion or another, following in Magritte’s path…

. Ben Kehoe

.

.

Ben Kehoe

.

Langdon Graves

.

Langdon Graves

.

Robin F. Williams

.

Robin F. Williams

.

Zachary Rossman

.

Zachary Rossman

.

Emma Tryti

.

Emma Tryti

.

Florencia Temperley

.

Florencia Temperley

.

Other Artist Cheat-Sheets: Frida KahloKeith HaringWassily KandinskyRoy LichtensteinGustav Klimt Georgia O’Keeffe

Killer Hotdogs and Capturing Butterflies of Time

May 26th, 2010 · No Comments

Mark Kochen is an artist and and painting instructor from Sioux City, Iowa whose work is vivid, honest and stripped of pretense. I talked to Mark about his series, Sum Parts, which is a surrealist visual diary from several months of the artist’s life. Kochen’s work flows from his strong imagination and profound candor. From his images of a hot dog tsunami to an “inner-state” highway flowing in and out of the body to the perspective from the artist’s canvas, we get a glimpse into Kochen’s personal mindscape and identify with his humanness.

What kinds of work do you do? How much do you draw/paint?

I mainly do painting. Occasionally I do little pen and ink drawings, or create odd photographs, but mostly it’s painting. I paint nearly every day. I’ve been traveling a lot, so my art schedule is a bit wonky at the moment, but still, I work on something painting related every day.


What got you into art in the first place?

I can’t tell you what event or sequence of events got me into art. It has just always been there. I’ve been drawing and painting as long as I can remember. As a child I always had a notebook with me.. and I was always doing something.

What inspires you and your work?

Life inspires my work. We all have the choice to do something or nothing. Creation is my something. It makes me feel human.


This series feels like a bit of a departure from your other work- more complex and elaborate. How does it fit into your body of work?

I would have to disagree with this question. The Sum Parts series was more of a jumping off point, and I don’t personally find it to be more complex or elaborate. Maybe the “View from the canvas” piece, but generally I feel my more recent work is the complex, elaborate stuff. The series fits into my pile of work somewhere in the middle. I fell in love with non-objective stuff early on, and my OCD tendencies played into that well. I created a ton of pieces and felt like I found my “voice”, but eventually that gave way to me wanting more content.. as far as stuff to think about goes. Well, that and my desire to remove any barriers that may have existed between myself and the viewer. The Sum Parts stuff was really the recorded transformation form being a presenter of balanced space, to being more of a story teller. That series eventually gave way to the serial pieces, which I see as a refinement of story telling. In Sum Parts, I told about me… Now I tell about my world. So.. I’m still story telling, its just that the camera has been pulled further back now. Big pictures stuff, you know?


The Sum Parts series feels pretty raw and existential, focusing on the inherent flaws or limitations of people. Is that how you see it too?

Not so much focusing on the flaws and limitations… more so the reality. I have nothing to hide. I have my ups and downs.. Sum Parts is me in my most vulnerable form I guess. Naked, confused, tormented by incessant thinking… Raw, existential.. those work. But remember, none of it is there to show any sort of negative. The pieces exist as a record of 3 – 4 months of my life. Nothing more, nothing less. Just trying to be an honest and upfront guy in a world plagued by bullshit and deception. There is one piece… not part of the series.. called “baring the imperfections”… that one is about flaws. I’ll admit to that one.